Type-A bureaucrat who professionally pushes papers in the Middle East. History nerd, linguistic geek, and devoted news junkie.
11525 stories
·
118 followers

Scientists Finally Starting To Study Menopause, Also, Too!

1 Comment
You could also try manual uterine palpation.

One of the weird things about bodies is that so very many people seem to have them, and yet not all of them are the same! This is something relatively recently discovered by such luminaries as NASA rocket scientists:

525,600 tampons. How do you measure a trip into space?

The details and implications of this knowledge are still being debated. But one interesting thing that happened along the way is that, according to The Atlantic, doctors started to realize that the questions that they asked FtM folk when they began therapy that artificially changed their hormone levels were not at all the same questions that they asked cis women going through spontaneous hormone changes at menopause.

Marci Bowers thought she understood menopause. Whenever she saw a patient in her 40s or 50s, she knew to ask about things such as hot flashes, vaginal dryness, mood swings, and memory problems. And no matter what a patient’s concern was, Bowers almost always ended up prescribing the same thing. “Our answer was always estrogen,” she told me.

Then in the mid-2000s, Bowers took over a gender-affirmation surgical practice in Colorado. In her new role, she began consultations by asking each patient what they wanted from their body—a question she’d never been trained to ask menopausal women. Over time, she grew comfortable bringing up tricky topics such as pleasure, desire, and sexuality, and prescribing testosterone as well as estrogen. That’s when she realized: Women in menopause were getting short shrift.

Menopause, for the uninitiated, is not merely relief from monthly bleeding. It’s a whole damn thing affecting more organs than you knew you had. And the transition from a stable adult menstrual cycle to a stable post-menopausal body state can be long and chaotic and affect far more than anyone has bothered to research. Kind of like menstruation itself! And while it’s caused to some significant degree by changes in estrogen, neither is that the only cause nor is replacing estrogen the only cure.

Bodies are highly individual things, almost like each person has their own version and it’s not the same as any other. Mind you, this has caused some distress for the medical profession, which has a history of very much wanting to square humans’ pegs and holes, regardless of the harm this might do. Recently, it seems, doctors have even become aware that hacking at the bodies of others in order to maintain binary illusions of an oppressive society may, in fact, be somewhat less than the ethical best practice.

As a result of all this exposure to radical trans antifa, BLM-HRT, police-defunding, highway- and puberty-blocking activists, a few doctors have been questioning a binary or two their own selves.

Although clinicians lack high-quality research on the role of testosterone in women over age 65, they know that in premenopausal women, it plays a role in bone density, heart health, metabolism, cognition, and the function of the ovaries and bladder. A 2022 review concluded, “Testosterone is a vital hormone in women in maintaining sexual health and function” after menopause.

Yet for decades, standard menopause care mostly would mostly pass over androgens. Interest in testosterone therapy has only begun rising—and rapidly—within the last 10 to 15 years. (Nota bene: the lack of research on testosterone use by perimenopausal women was not cited by the NHS as a reason to shut down such “experimental” prescriptions. This is our shocked face.)

There are more barriers than lack of research, however. It turns out that getting cis women comfortable with taking testosterone is not always easy even when it would be medically helpful, for they sometimes think the doctors are calling them trans for the temerity of ceasing menstruation:

[Cis women] have to get used to the idea of taking a hormone they’ve been told all their lives is for men, at just the time when their femininity can feel most tenuous […but…] taking testosterone wouldn’t change a menopause patient’s gender identity.

And patients are not the only ones struggling with holistic care for bodies that produce lots of hormones to varying degrees. Pharmacists, too, have a hard time believing leavening estrogen therapies with a bit of testosterone is kosher:

Some of [Dr. Kelly] Casperson’s female patients have had their testosterone prescription withheld by pharmacists; one was asked if she was undergoing gender transition.

While rapid-onset vaginal dryness has been observed as a side effect of even small doses of Ben Shapiro, the Cooties Hypothesis asserting social transmission of perimenopausal sexual symptoms seems unlikely to go viral, and there is as yet no movement to withhold testosterone from 52-year-old cis women for Baby Jesus and Western Civilization.

What does this all mean?

It means that trans people fighting for the medical establishment to take their care seriously has knock-up effects for cis health, and thus the more doctors get comfortable with trans lives, the better cis women’s care. Queer cis women, too, have benefited straight cis women’s care by challenging assumptions that what women want is too obvious to bother actually asking women. After centuries ignoring women’s desire, The Atlantic reports doctors are beginning conversations with

“Tell me about your sexuality. Tell me, are you happy with that? How long does it take you to orgasm? Do you masturbate? What do you use?”

And the benefits go both ways: trans men who experience menopause as a result of hormone therapy can now benefit from topical vaginal estrogen cremes originally developed to relieve dryness and vaginal pain during straight, menopausal women’s penetrative sex. (Though given the historical lack of conversation about cis women’s desire, it’s likely that these cremes were developed more with an eye towards the benefits to cis het men who didn’t like being turned down.)

This isn’t the only benefit either. Doctors have recently been studying menstruation and fertility in FtM folks taking testosterone, and to the surprise of many a third still ovulated. This should not have been news as testosterone isn’t birth control. Indeed it was tried decades ago to poor effect. And yet this was news in trans communities.

Why don’t we already know these things, study these things, talk about these things?

Part of the problem is that society insists on treating different communities as entirely separate, even when that’s radically inappropriate. And society does this in ways more hypocritic than hippocratic. For decades drug manufacturers would only include cis men in clinical trials of medicines because female bodies were considered a confound and male-bodied trans people were considered to have a confounding illness, even though there was no reason to think that a medicine would know your gender identity and function differently because of that. Yet after trials, manufacturers wanted their drugs prescribed to everyone as if they had been found safe and effective for every body. Even today the safety of many drugs for fetuses or pregnancies or female fertility has gone unstudied, yet the drugs are still prescribed for people who are or may become pregnant, with barely (and not always) an “ask your doctor if” warning.

But they’ve taken the opposite approach when the benefits might flow to patients instead of investors: anti-trans fuckfaces continually insist that puberty blockers have not been proven safe for trans children going through puberty. Yet these are old and well-tested drugs. And yet, the Cass Review is right there, insisting that bone density development during the years of postponed puberty must be studied before puberty blockers can be considered safe for adolescents diagnosed with gender dysphoria. Scotland has even decided to ban the use of puberty blockers until the age of 18, which Yr Wonkette thinks we can all agree misses the point of “puberty blocker” by rather a large margin.

We have said before that trans rights are reproductive rights, and that we are all in this together, and we are not the only ones to notice. Sad Brown Girl writes, “Despite the ongoing rhetorical battles over how trans people should be included in discussions of abortion, the link is unambiguous for those seeking the end of both: as goes abortion, so too transition, and vice versa.”

The Pope agrees, throwing in surrogacy for good measure.

The Vatican on Monday declared gender-affirming surgery and surrogacy as grave violations of human dignity, putting them on par with abortion and euthanasia as practices that it said reject God’s plan for human life. […]

[Pope Francis] has also denounced “gender theory” as the “worst danger” facing humanity today.

Yr Wonkette does not pretend to know whether asking someone what name they prefer is worse than climate change burning Canada to death and choking New York City on the ash, but we do know that the Pope is unlikely to be factoring in the benefits to straight cis women’s sex lives that accrue when all of us, regardless of gender, are treated as whole, complex people who deserve healthy bodies and happy lives.

[Atlantic]

Give Wonkette yr monies to help stock up on chocolate cakes for the menopaucalypse!



Read the whole story
hannahdraper
15 hours ago
reply
Yr Wonkette does not pretend to know whether asking someone what name they prefer is worse than climate change burning Canada to death and choking New York City on the ash, but we do know that the Pope is unlikely to be factoring in the benefits to straight cis women’s sex lives that accrue when all of us, regardless of gender, are treated as whole, complex people who deserve healthy bodies and happy lives.
Washington, DC
Share this story
Delete

This is a teenager

1 Comment
Watch hundreds of teenagers grow up into adults – and see how their lives turn out
Read the whole story
hannahdraper
21 hours ago
reply
Incredible visualization work.
Washington, DC
Share this story
Delete

Venezuelans on mopeds are driving D.C.’s food delivery scene - The Washington Post

2 Shares

It’s 4 p.m., and the corner of 14th and Irving streets NW in D.C. brims with activity. Vendors fervently tout their offerings — “mango, mango, mango fresco” and “tenemos tacos” — against a din of hip-hop, the occasional siren and a preacher’s voice booming through a loudspeaker.

Nearby, some 20 moped drivers sit parked in a line, wedged behind a bike lane and stalls selling coconuts and Ethiopian barbecue. Some sip Chick-fil-A milkshakes or listen to music as they wait for their phones to ping: the welcome sound of a hungry customer ordering delivery.

The drivers have become a fixture on this corner in Columbia Heights, part of a new wave of Venezuelan immigrants who have entered the capital’s food delivery industry and filled the city’s streets with mopeds. Many are among the nearly 8 million people who have fled Venezuela since 2014, as the country faces a political, economic and humanitarian crisis. While most have set down roots across Latin America, the number of migrants trekking north to the United States has soared in recent years. They’ve also brought a food delivery system that’s helped them survive in other countries.

The Washington Post spoke with more than 15 Venezuelan moped drivers about their growing, not-so-underground economy. Delivering food for companies like DoorDash and Uber has become a lifeline for many of D.C.’s Venezuelans, some of whom were among the more than 13,000 migrants Republican governors have bused to the city since 2022. As they pursue the months-long process of claiming asylum and applying for work permits, many immigrants have leaned on food delivery to stay afloat financially.

For most, food delivery offers far more autonomy over their schedules and pay than other industries. But they acknowledged numerous hurdles — for instance, the lack of access to health insurance, which heightens the financial risks of any accident. Expenses such as “renting” food-delivery accounts and financing mopeds add to their burdens. And while some drivers say that their ability to deliver food quickly has been praised by customers and restaurants, some D.C. residents have publicly expressed frustration at what they say is erratic and unsafe behavior on the mopeds.

Yonatan Colmenarez, a 31-year-old Venezuelan immigrant, has made a living as a moped delivery driver since February. Today, he’s been up since sunrise, but the day has been slow. Around 4:10 p.m., he gets a notification from his Uber Eats account.

It takes Colmenarez a little over three minutes to hop on his moped and grab the order at Lou’s City Bar about a block away. By 4:21 p.m., he’s carefully placed the food in front of a resident’s door. Colmenarez has made $3 on the trip, adding to the $90 he has gathered by riding all over Washington. But he’ll be out on the street until midnight — or, at least, until he makes his daily goal of $200.

“I’m working really hard to contribute to this country that opened its doors to us,” Colmenarez said in Spanish. “At the end of the day, it’s a job many Americans don’t want to do, but I do it gladly because I want to show that I appreciate being here and that most of us are good people. After all it took to arrive, being in the United States is truly a blessing from God.”

Though their paths in the United States differ, many of the Venezuelans’ stories begin the same way: Desperation and a hope for a brighter future that propels them to embark on a perilous journey north — one often marked by death.

Colmenarez was once a member of the Venezuelan army. Over time, he became disenchanted by the country’s authoritarian government and how years of mismanagement had resulted in families barely scraping by and struggling to feed their children. In 2016, he defected to Colombia. For seven years, he dabbled in taxi driving, food delivery and document processing — a skill he acquired while working at Venezuela’s civil registry agency. In 2023, Colombia’s low salaries, inflation and lack of jobs pushed him to venture to the United States.

He left last April with $228 in his pocket, a small backpack and one big prayer: “I said, ‘Lord, if it’s your will, someday you’ll let me arrive. And if I do, I just ask that you help me save enough to buy a house in my country — whatever else you give me ahead will be blessings.’”

Colmenarez said he nearly died after crossing a treacherous swath of jungle between Colombia and Panama, known as the Darién Gap. He ran out of money and resorted to drinking from puddles and rivers, which gave him a severe infection.

By May 1, Colmenarez had crossed — mostly by foot — through Panama, Honduras, Guatemala and Mexico, where he turned himself in to U.S. officials in Ciudad Juárez. After he was processed and released on parole some 13 days later, a friend helped him pay for a flight to D.C. He spent his first night on the street, perched on a park bench and shivering from the cold.

The moped deliveries in D.C. began about two years ago, according to the drivers, with three Venezuelan immigrants and one Colombian. Since then, the trade has evolved into a cottage industry fostered by word-of-mouth recommendations and mutual trust. The drivers share advice, from navigating the labyrinth of popular eateries to establishing online bank accounts with minimal verification. Many buy their mopeds from Facebook Marketplace, local stores or from one man who sells them out of a white van near a Panda Express in Columbia Heights.

After arriving in D.C., Colmenarez found himself a home in one of the city’s shelters and eventually gained work authorization. He decided to take up moped deliveries after hearing about them from a friend, figuring that would be a better option than juggling work at a construction company in Virginia during the day and a midnight shift at McDonald’s.

In February, he gathered $300 to pay the first weekly installment for a $1,500 moped from a Colombian man who had imported the vehicles from New York City, where immigrants are similarly working as delivery drivers. He opened an Uber Eats account and set up a schedule: delivering from 7 a.m. to about 3 p.m., resting at 4 p.m., a slow period the drivers call “la hora muerta,” and heading back out from 5 p.m. to midnight, six days a week.

Now, Colmenarez makes about $4,000 each month — $700 of which he sends to his wife and three children, who live in a home he bought for them in Venezuela with his earnings, “just like I asked God for.”

Others in the business said they earn about the same amount as Colmenarez, though much depends on the time they put in and the tips they receive. The earnings have allowed many to afford rent in neighborhoods across the region, especially in Maryland, where most of the drivers said they live. Some have also bought cars or higher-quality mopeds. Others help their families and take English lessons at night.

The job comes with challenges: The migrants work rain or shine and in snow, ice and wind. Their mopeds have occasionally been stolen — but some said that, instead of reporting it to police, they try to gather enough money to buy another bike. And car drivers who aren’t used to mopeds on the streets seemingly “just throw themselves at us,” said Raibi González, 32.

Many migrants without work permits “rent” Uber Eats or DoorDash accounts from relatives or friends, often for a weekly fee of $100 to $150. Spokespeople for Uber and DoorDash said they have safeguards in place to try to ensure that everyone using their platforms is who they say they are. Both said anyone using an account fraudulently will be removed from the app.

Several drivers said D.C. police have mostly left them alone, but they fear that any misstep could cause police to crack down on unregistered mopeds, like they’ve done in New York City.

City officials from the Office of Migrant Services and the Highway Safety Office have been meeting with the drivers and their vendors to educate them about local traffic rules.

“Fortunately, we have seen no uptick in crashes involving these devices and we want it to stay that way,” Deputy Mayor for Operations and Infrastructure Keith Anderson said in a statement.

To avoid confrontations with other residents or police, some drivers are seeking to formalize their work with the city. They’ve proposed having a delimited area where they can park without disturbing traffic; organizing more courses on traffic rules; wearing uniforms that highlight them as delivery drivers; and getting help registering their mopeds — a process that requires identification documents, such as a passport, that are hard to come by in Venezuela and that many migrants don’t have.

D.C. law requires drivers to register mopeds with more than 55 cubic centimeters of motor power. That means many of the delivery workers’ vehicles should be registered, said council member Brianne K. Nadeau (D-Ward 1), who represents Columbia Heights and chairs the committee overseeing regulation of for-hire vehicles. Registrations of motor-driven cycles, a category that includes mopeds, more than doubled last year, from 54 in 2022 to 143 in 2023, according to the D.C. Department of Motor Vehicles.

Nadaeu said she supports clarifying the registration rules and educating recent immigrants about the requirements. She added that she arranged for a traffic-control officer at 14th and Irving streets NW to designate an area where the mopeds can park without blocking traffic.

“As we continue to redesign our streets, we need to be thinking about how to incorporate these vehicles and their uses,” Nadeau said.

The more the city supports the drivers, the better, said Abel Nuñez, executive director of the local immigration advocacy group CARECEN. More organization, he said, could help new immigrants safely make a living without relying on government subsidies.

“It’s a little messy right now, but it has incredible potential to be a win-win for everyone,” Nuñez said.

Andy Brown, owner of popular local chain Andy’s Pizza, mostly sees the messiness. He said he has asked delivery apps not to send moped drivers to his restaurants and directs his staff to turn drivers away if they arrive on the bikes anyway.

Many customers have complained about pizzas being cold after arriving via moped, with air rushing into the box during transit, he said. While Brown appreciates that food delivery enables recent immigrants to work, he’s concerned about the impact on his business.

“There’s pros and cons,” he said. “There just are.”

Every morning, Colmenarez repeats the same mantra: “Be an eagle.” It’s a phrase he borrowed from an interview with a taxi driver he saw online, which, in essence, means going the extra mile for the job.

For Colmenarez, that means meticulously choosing his outfit, spraying cologne before leaving and constantly communicating with his customers — something that, he said, has enabled him to achieve Uber’s highest status tier for drivers, Diamond. But it’s not always easy: There’s usually a language barrier. And he grieves the distance from his family.

“I’ve had to cry alone because there are moments when one gets depressed,” he said. “But then, you say, ‘Let’s go, you can find a way’ — that is, instead of doing bad things, always trying to find a way to make a difference.”

Colmenarez returns to the silver linings: The city he gets to explore. The beauty of the sun as it sets over historic monuments. His children’s smiles when they FaceTime. The people he feeds every time his phone pings — whether they’re in the Russell Senate Office Building, the White House, a police station or a random apartment building.

“I’ve made it this far in the American Dream,” Colmenarez said.

For some, that dream means grinding as delivery drivers for as long as there’s appetite in the city. Others hope to land better jobs or make enough money to have their families join them in the United States.

“Or you know what? Maybe starting a podcast or becoming the owner of the same food franchises we come to every day to pick up orders,” said Julio Bello, 28. “The sky is the limit.”

Read the whole story
hannahdraper
21 hours ago
reply
Washington, DC
acdha
1 day ago
reply
Washington, DC
Share this story
Delete

Wildest exit

1 Share

 

József Szájer’s departure from Parliament involved an orgy, an attempted escape along a gutter and a backpack containing narcotics.

According to the Parliament’s records, 162 lawmakers left the chamber ahead of the end of their mandates, including 73 Brits who crossed back over the Channel on January 31, 2020. When it comes to sheer memorability, none of their exits come anywhere close to the that of Hungarian conservative’s.

Szájer was a close confidant of Viktor Orbán and a cofounder of his nationalist Fidesz party. He fell from the Hungarian leader’s grace in December 2020 after police caught him fleeing a party they said was in breach of coronavirus lockdown rules after they found 25 naked men in attendance.

“A passer-by reported to the police that he had seen a man fleeing along the gutter; he was able to identify the man,” reads the press release from the public prosecutor’s office. “The man’s hands were bloody. It is possible that he may have been injured while fleeing. Narcotics were found in his backpack. The man was unable to produce any identity documents. He was escorted to his place of residence, where he identified himself as S. J. (1961) by means of a diplomatic passport.”

Orbán called the deed “unacceptable and indefensible.” Suffice to say, Szájer quit the party and his post in Brussels. A political comeback is — we believe — unlikely.

Honorable mention: Helmut Geuking, a German lawmaker from a fringe party in the EPP, quit as EU lawmaker in February. He was officially replaced by his son Niels Geuking. The name of their small political movement is the Family Party. Of course it is.

Chances of getting reelected: Not running.

— Laurens Cerulus and Eddy Wax

Read the whole story
hannahdraper
21 hours ago
reply
Washington, DC
Share this story
Delete

Let’s Be Careful Out There…

1 Comment
IAF F-35I Adir, Israel’s Independence Day 2019

Israel reacts in muted fashion:

The Israeli military struck Iran early on Friday, according to two Israeli and three Iranian officials, in what appeared to be Israel’s first military response to Iran’s attack last weekend but one whose scope, at least initially, appeared to be limited.

The Iranian officials said that a strike had hit a military air base near the city of Isfahan, in central Iran. Initial reaction in both Israel and Iran was muted, with news media in both countries appearing to play down the attack, in what analysts said was a sign that the rivals were seeking to de-escalate tensions. For nearly a week, world leaders have urged Israel and Iran to avoid sparking a broader war in the region.

The Israeli military declined to comment. All the officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the matter publicly.

This is about as “let’s chill this shit out” as you can get with missiles, but it is nevertheless a direct attack on Iran. While the senior levels of government in both Tehran and Jerusalem clearly want this to end, they’ll need to take great care with their own security services in order to ensure that the conflict doesn’t take on a life of its own.

…by the way, this shit will get you immediately, permanently banned.

The post Let’s Be Careful Out There… appeared first on Lawyers, Guns & Money.

Read the whole story
hannahdraper
21 hours ago
reply
This is about as “let’s chill this shit out” as you can get with missiles, but it is nevertheless a direct attack on Iran. While the senior levels of government in both Tehran and Jerusalem clearly want this to end, they’ll need to take great care with their own security services in order to ensure that the conflict doesn’t take on a life of its own.
Washington, DC
Share this story
Delete

‘Did Something Happen to Mom When She Was Young?’

1 Share

Jessica Bateman is a writer covering social and human rights issues around Europe.

In 1986, when David Whelan was just a baby, his mother Joan had her first psychotic break. Throughout David’s childhood, Joan spent time in institutions and eventually was diagnosed with bipolar disorder. David always wondered whether something in her past had triggered it; all he knew was that his mother had been adopted from Greece when she was young, and that something tragic had happened to her parents.

As a kid, David never dared to broach the subject. But in 2013, when he was 26 and back home visiting from grad school, he worked up the nerve to talk to his father. “Did something happen to mom when she was young?”

“She said it’s OK for me to tell you,” his dad finally explained one evening after David had been asking for months. “Her father was executed in Greece by firing squad. He was something political.”

A few days later, David’s father passed him copies of his mother’s birth parents’ death certificates. David typed his grandfather’s name, Elias Argyriadis, into Google. He read that Joan’s father had been a communist leader who had been accused of espionage and sentenced to death in Athens in 1952.

David was ecstatic at finally solving the puzzle of his mother’s past. But just as one question was answered, a dozen others popped up. If her father was executed in Greece, then how had she been adopted in the U.S.? What exactly had her adopted parents — who were now both dead — known about it? And did she still have relatives in Greece?

Unbeknownst to him, David was about to unravel a hidden-away part of history, intertwined with Cold War politics, secrets and lies, that is still affecting the daily lives of hundreds of American citizens. And he would also soon find out that 5,000 miles away, on the other side of the Atlantic, someone else had been trying to solve the mystery of what happened to his mother, too.

David’s mother Joan’s adoption was not a one-off, but part of a larger phenomenon that took place after the end of the Greek Civil War in 1949. Although not as well-known as the Vietnamese or Korean wars, it is considered the first proxy conflict of the Cold War. The U.S. and U.K. backed a right-wing royalist government, and communist states supported leftist guerrilla fighters.

The conflict also gave rise to the world’s first inter-country adoption industry. Throughout the 1950s and ’60s, around 4,000 Greek children were adopted abroad, mostly by Americans — and often in questionable circumstances.

Many early adoptees were the orphaned children of rebel leftist fighters, whom Western-backed Greek politicians hoped could be “reeducated” to be sympathetic to the West and antagonistic to communism. But as the U.S. economy boomed in the 1950s, and the nuclear family became the suburban ideal, some Americans began to view Greece as an easy source of white, adoptable babies. An endeavor to home needy children eventually expanded to a broader population of the poor in Greece, growing into a full-on baby trafficking racket that is only now being fully understood. Mothers in Greece were pressured to give up children, and adoptive parents did not have to undergo any screening so long as they could pay the fees.

Cold War-era narratives about “saving” children from communism, and Greece’s post-war economic reliance on the United States, motivated both the people pushing adoptions and the families who received children in the U.S. “We cannot understand the adoptions outside of the context of Cold War ideologies,” says historian Christos Triantafyllou, a postdoctoral researcher at the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens. “Communism was perceived to be an illness, [and] Western liberal democracy was considered the only pathway for Greece.” The children sent to the U.S. “embodied the hope that Greece would remain on the correct side.”

The majority of Greek adoptees in the U.S. from that era still don’t know who their biological families are. The convoluted proxies that were used in most cases mean that many don’t have a parent’s name on their birth certificates. Most only become aware that their biological parents may not have given informed consent for their adoptions if they come across one of the few news articles about the cases, such as a New York Times story from 1996. As most biological parents would now be in their 80s or 90s, it’s not uncommon for adoptees to trace their families only to find that one or both parents are now dead.

This underexplored chapter of U.S. foreign policy reveals a devastating aspect of how the U.S. and its allies allowed the anti-communist fever after World War II to brutally rupture the lives of ordinary citizens, even those with no connection to politics — such as young children. The Greek baby trade created a blueprint for international adoption that was quickly replicated in other countries, including South Korea. Politically motivated adoptions still happen during conflicts today, such as Russia’s “re-education” programs for thousands of Ukrainian children. And those taken from Greece all those years ago, who are now U.S. citizens in their 60s and 70s, are still trying to uncover the truth about their past.

When I met her in Athens last September, Efterpi Argyriadis, known as Efi, was sitting on a sofa with a picture of her father Elias — David’s maternal grandfather — mounted on the wall next to her. Elias is sitting in court, staring straight at the camera, with an anguished look in his eye. Around her living room, rows of wooden shelves were stuffed with books on Greek history and communist politics. Now 84, Efi could still recall in vivid detail the day in 1951 when her younger sisters, Ioanna, aged 6, and Olympia, aged 3, were taken by police.

Greece had been brutally occupied by the Nazis during World War II. Guerrilla fighters — many of whom supported the Greek communist party — fought against Germany and Italy, alongside the allies. But after the Nazis were defeated, the rebel fighters demanded a say in the running of newly liberated Greece. The country’s strategic position between Europe and the Middle East meant Western governments could not stomach the thought of it turning communist. The U.K. and U.S. turned on the leftist fighters they had previously collaborated with, backing a right-wing, semi-autocratic government in the ensuing civil war.

After the government’s victory, it set about persecuting communists — or anyone perceived to be one — with particular brutality. The Greek communist party, the KKE, was outlawed and members were imprisoned, exiled, tortured and executed. The country’s main income source was aid from the Marshall Plan, meaning U.S. influence loomed large.

Children of leftists were also targeted, with both sides accusing the other of brainwashing the young. Greece’s Queen Frederica ran a network of “orphanages” where children of dead, exiled or imprisoned leftists were sent for “re-education,” while many leftist families smuggled children across borders to countries now behind the Iron Curtain of Soviet control.

Efi’s father Elias was a high-ranking KKE member. The family lived on a poultry farm on the outskirts of Athens, with a secret bunker underneath where he communicated via radio with exiled comrades in eastern Europe. When the house was eventually raided by police in November 1951, he was accused of spying for the USSR and thrown in jail along with his wife Katerina Dalla — the mother of the two younger girls. When Dalla was released a few days later, Efi says her head was wrapped in bandages and she claimed she had been tortured with a vise-like device. Dalla then killed herself by jumping out a window of the family home.

On November 30, 1951, just three days after Dalla’s suicide, a statement by the president of Greece’s child protection agency, Lina Tsaldari — who would go on to become the minister for social welfare — was published on the front page of Ta Nea, a leading right-wing newspaper. “What will become of [Argyriadis’s] children?” it asked. “We want them to be given back to us [i.e., to Greece], regardless of whether they have lived in a communist climate.”

Alone with her two younger sisters, 13-year-old Efi tried her hardest to maintain a sense of normality. She bribed the police officers surrounding the house to go fetch groceries and cooked the girls their grandmother’s meatball recipe. On December 7 — the day she describes as “the worst of them all” — a jeep pulled up outside and four police officers stepped out. Efi screamed and wrestled with them, as they grabbed Ioanna and Olympia from her.

The girls were placed with a foster family in a nearby suburb while Efi stayed in the family property with an aunt and uncle. One day when Efi went to visit, the foster parents told her the girls were gone and to never come back. Efi could not find out anything more. It was as if they had disappeared.

Elias Argyriadis and three co-defendants were sentenced to death on March 1, 1952, despite international outcry and a telegram campaign supported by figures including Pablo Picasso. The men refused to be blindfolded as they stood in front of a firing squad.

Efi decided immediately that she would make it her life’s work to find out what happened to her sisters.


Unbeknownst to Efi, Greek social services — which had embraced the anti-communist fervor — had arranged for the sisters to be adopted by Paul and Athena Scangas, two politically conservative second-generation Greek Americans. The couple were the epitome of the American dream: Paul was a successful dairy entrepreneur and Athena a proud homemaker, and they lived in a palatial house in suburban Massachusetts. According to Greek newspaper articles eventually published in 1980 recounting the girls’ adoption records, the Scangases knew who the girls’ parents were and how they had died.

It was clear to David from his first Google search that his mother’s adoption was historically significant. However, he struggled to find more information about Joan’s relatives. None of his family knew — or would admit to knowing — very much, and there was little else online or in books. So he emailed various academics specializing in modern Greece, briefly explaining his family history. One of these was Gonda Van Steen, a specialist in Greek language and literature at King’s College London.

The email took Van Steen by surprise when she received it in 2013. She Googled “illegal Greek adoptions” and found a cluster of lurid news articles from the 1990s about stolen babies. Then she consulted her history books — but found nothing. In Greek newspaper archives she managed to find various interviews Efi had given, demanding to know what happened to her sisters. But none of the coverage had made it across the Atlantic.

As Van Steen continued digging, she realized Joan’s adoption was just the tip of an iceberg. While 1950s Greece struggled with the aftermath of war, the U.S. was booming. Within the country, the number of babies available for adoption couldn’t keep up with the families who wanted them. Van Steen soon found herself down a research rabbit-hole, which resulted in her 2019 book, Adoption, Memory and Cold War Greece: Kid pro quo? Van Steen found that Queen Frederica’s “re-education” orphanages were expensive to run, and they were filling up with the children of poor unwed mothers. Foreign adoption offered a cost-saving solution.

Frederica had a powerful Greek American ally in Spyros P. Skouras, then-president of the film studio 21st Century Fox, and together they ran glamorous fundraising events across the U.S. for “The Queen’s Orphans Fund.” She also drummed up favorable press coverage in magazines including Life and Time. Archive images show Hollywood stars such as Marlon Brando and Jane Russell — founder of the World Adoption International Fund and one of the first “celebrity adopters” — posing with Greek orphans. Newspapers frequently ran stories on orphan arrivals, often mentioning the “communist fighting” they had been rescued from.

Most of these adoptions were organized by the American Hellenic Educational Progressive Association (AHEPA), a fraternal organization originally established to “Americanize” Greek migrants. AHEPA developed the “proxy adoption” model, which is when parents use a representative to adopt a child abroad. This means the adoptive parents don’t meet the child beforehand, nor are they vetted by social services.

Cold War politics also softened immigration laws. President Eisenhower’s 1953 Refugee Relief Act made it easier for Europeans who were victims or opponents of communism to flee to the U.S. It also rapidly sped up international adoption, with the majority of visas for Greek children issued under this act. The same year, Greece and the U.S. signed bilateral agreements prioritizing American investment and security presence in the country. As the dependent country, Greece was soon expected to also provide a steady stream of adoptable children, and Greek politicians understood these children could become an excellent diplomatic relations tool.

The earliest adoptions sought to place children with conservative, well-off Greek Americans like the Scangases. But as soon as central AHEPA figures understood how much money could be made from American families desperate for a child, things began to change.

Maria Papadopolou was 10 years old when she was told she and her three brothers had been adopted from Greece. Her adoptive parents, who were prominent Mormons in Salt Lake City, explained they had been unable to conceive, and so had asked her uncle — a Stanford professor who traveled regularly — to find them adoptable children abroad. He noticed Maria in an Athens orphanage when she was one. Her parents explained to her that her birth mother hadn’t wanted her. From their description, her mother had been a reckless, uneducated young woman, and Maria would have had no life in Greece.

But the adoptive household wasn’t a happy one. Maria describes growing up within Mormon culture as “hell.” Her adoptive parents were strong Type A personalities, ill-equipped to deal with the challenges that may come with adopting multiple children from a different culture. When Maria left home at age 20, her adoptive mother told her never to come back. “You’re on your own now,” she said. (Maria requested we refer to her by her birth name, rather than the name she grew up with after she was adopted.)

As Maria grew up and had two children of her own, she never stopped wondering about her birth family. She wanted to know who she looked like. According to Rachel Winslow, author of The Best Possible Immigrants: International Adoption and the American Family, Greek adoptees were popular because they were considered white. However, growing up in Utah surrounded by people of Northern European ancestry, Maria always stood out. People often struggled to place her ethnicity or would speak to her in Spanish.

Her older daughter Alexis, who is now 33, eventually decided to conduct a search. “[My mom’s life] has been really hard,” Alexis told me. “I think she deserves to have her history and identity restored to her.”

Alexis tried various tactics, such as reaching out to the Greek consulate in the U.S., but was constantly stonewalled. Then in 2021, she came across an article about Van Steen’s book, and decided to email her. Van Steen took a look at Maria’s adoption papers and saw her mother’s name was right there — the family had never realized, as they didn’t speak Greek. Within five days, they had found her biological family on Facebook.

From looking through the unpublished memoirs of Maria’s uncle, the Stanford professor, and comparing them to emails and interviews with her biological family in Greece, a different story emerged than the one Maria had been told. Maria’s mother was in her early 20s and became pregnant when she was raped by the owner of a farm she worked on. As an unwed mother she was shunned by her rural community and moved to the capital, Athens, where she took a job as a hospital cleaner. She placed Maria in an orphanage but visited her every single day. Crucially, she did not give permission for her to be adopted.

When Maria’s uncle came to browse the orphanage in 1953, he decided Maria looked like “one of the healthiest” children. The orphanage said he could take her as long as her mother agreed. He and a lawyer confronted her at her workplace and pressured her to sign the papers, telling her the child would have a better life in America than she could ever give it. In his memoir he describes tears rolling down the woman’s face.

The Orthodox Church in Greece was not happy that the family were Mormon, as Greek American parents were still prioritized at that time. But Maria’s uncle was friends with the U.S. ambassador, Cavendish W. Cannon, who knew the head of the Greek Orthodox Church personally, and intervened to complete the adoption.

“I’d been told my mother didn’t want me, but that wasn’t true,” says Maria. “None of it was true.” And there was more. Maria’s mother was still alive.

Political adoptions continued up until around 1955. After that, they were largely driven by economics. According to U.S. visa records collated by Van Steen, 3,116 children were adopted from Greece between 1948 and 1962 — 16 percent of the total number of foreign-born adoptees. “Greek children became part of the exchange of goods and services that the Marshall Plan had initiated,” writes Van Steen.

AHEPA began prioritizing non-Greek American adoptive parents, to whom it charged inflated fees of up to $2,800 per adoption — equivalent to $30,000 today. Most children brought to the U.S. were labeled as “orphans” or “foundlings” — a common story was that the child had been found in a basket in front of an orphanage. The children arrived as blank slates, their histories erased. However, there was no way to verify whether these stories were true. Some may have genuinely been abandoned, but Van Steen believes a significant number of parents were coerced or manipulated, like Maria’s mother.

Complaints began circling in the mid-1950s about AHEPA’s failure to screen adoptive families and its refusal to work with child welfare professionals. In 1959, the Greek left-wing newspaper Eleftheria published a three-part investigation exposing the baby trade and detailing the risks of proxy adoption.

There was public outcry in Greece. AHEPA president Stephen S. Scopas — a well-known New York magistrate — was arrested on child trafficking charges. “SCOPAS ARRESTED IN SALE OF BABIES,” blared a May 1959 New York Times headline. But he was eventually acquitted as the proxy adoptions occurred in Greece, rendering them outside the jurisdiction of New York courts. The number of Greece-to-U.S. adoptions dwindled to less than 10 a year, consigning the era to the dustiest corners of history by the time the adoptees grew up.

After her sisters were taken, Efi spent the next 25 years wondering if they were even alive. She was stonewalled, dismissed and harassed by authorities every time she tried to push for information. Greece was ruled by a military dictatorship in the late ’60s to mid ’70s, making it impossible to communicate with anyone in power.

In 1980 a Greek film about the executed communists, The Man with the Carnation, was released, and Efi saw a chance to get press attention. She gave an interview with a left-wing newspaper, which then ran an editorial demanding the government reveal what happened to the children.

Efi teamed up with a journalist to badger officials. Eventually, a minister tipped her off as to which government office she should look in. When the pair arrived, they saw a sign saying “adoptions.” The reporter headed into the documents section, eventually emerging with a file in his hand. “I found it,” he said.

The papers inside told the entire story: how the girls had been adopted, and even the names of their new parents. Through a contact in the Greek Orthodox Church in the U.S., she tracked down Ioanna/Joan’s home address.

Efi wrote several letters to her sister throughout the 1980s and ‘90s. But she never received a response. On the other side of the Atlantic, Joan’s husband — David’s father — was intercepting them.


In May 2021, Maria Papadopolou, her daughter Alexis and son Madison touched down in Athens. They waited nervously outside their hotel as a taxi pulled up and an old woman stepped out. She was short — below five feet — and had clearly dressed up in her best clothes: a red lace blouse, pearl necklace and matching earrings.

Her eyes fixed on Maria as she walked towards her. Maria could immediately see how alike they looked. She’d always joked that she was built like a refrigerator — straight up and down — and her mother had the exact same shape. Her adult children — Maria’s brother and sister — were with her, along with their own children.

As she approached, the old woman burst into tears, then reached and grabbed Maria, refusing to let her go. The group walked to a restaurant, with her mother clutching her hand the entire time. Over a meal of meze they spoke in a mixture of Greek, with Maria’s biological nephew translating, and broken English. Maria’s mother wouldn’t take her eyes off her. She explained she had always wanted to search for Maria, too, but hadn’t known how. She still had her baby blanket.

Maria had hoped to return to Greece again one day. But two years later, in the spring of 2023 she noticed people posting condolences in Greek on her biological brother’s Facebook wall. Her siblings confirmed her mother had died.

“Just from that one meeting, I miss her so much,” she said. “And I wish I could have had more time with her.”

After he learned from Van Steen of his Aunt Efi’s existence, David organized a trip to meet her in Athens in the summer of 2014. As he stepped out the elevator in her apartment building he saw her standing in the doorway, the light from the room behind illuminating her like a halo. She grabbed him in a strong embrace, holding him tight for several minutes. As he walked into the apartment he saw the picture of Elias, his grandfather, on the wall. He recognized the man’s solemn expression, sculptural nose and rounded cheeks. “That’s my mom’s face,” he thought.

Over the next few days, he debriefed with Efi and her husband and daughter over cups of strong Greek coffee. David’s aunt Olympia/Kathryn also finally arranged a visit that year, too. She told Efi she could still remember the meatballs she used to cook before the family was split apart.

After some persuasion David’s father eventually agreed to facilitate a call between Efi and Ioanna/Joan. David and the rest of the family stood staring as Efi, perched on the side of her bed, spoke to Joan in Greek for around three minutes. David was surprised — he had never heard his mother speaking the language before.

After Efi hung up the family rushed to hug her, then they all retired to the lounge while talking excitedly. David sent his father a quick text to ask how Joan had handled the conversation. His reply was unexpected: “I don’t think she fully understood who she was speaking to.” His father elaborated, explaining that Joan’s health had deteriorated that summer. She was suffering severe memory loss.

David stood there, feeling the burden of the news, as he listened to his Greek family celebrating. He wondered if it would be cruel to puncture their happiness. “Then I thought, so much of this damn story is people withholding information,” he says. “I just don’t want to continue that.” He walked into the lounge and told the family about the conversation he just had, and immediately felt the atmosphere in the room fall flat.

Joan’s dementia rapidly accelerated after David returned to the U.S., and she died in April 2020. Despite all the research, the conversations and the reunions, David feels there will always be something missing. All the attempts to tie up loose ends can never make up for the many years spent apart.

“There’s always going to be a gap there that we can’t fill,” he says. “And I’ve learnt that all you can do is try to make the frame surrounding that gap as beautiful as possible.”

Read the whole story
hannahdraper
22 hours ago
reply
Washington, DC
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories