In 1575, Miguel de Cervantes, after fighting on behalf of Spain during its war against the Ottoman Empire and being badly wounded in the Battle of Lepanto, left the army with his younger brother Rodrigo and boarded a ship for Spain. During bad weather, their ship separated from its companion galleons and was attacked by corsairs, or pirates, of the Regency of Algiers.

Miguel and Rodrigo were captured and imprisoned in a disused bath house in Algiers. Based on letters of recommendation that Miguel was carrying, their captors held them for ransom, as that promised to be more profitable than selling the brothers as slaves. The Cervantes family gathered what they could for ransom, but only managed to free Rodrigo in 1577.

Miguel attempted to escape four times. During one attempt, he hid out in this cave for a period of months before being recaptured. He was ultimately ransomed with the aid of a Spanish religious order in 1580.

Cervantes told and retold the story of his years in captivity in literary works following his release, from the play Life in Algiers to the posthumously published novel, The Travails of Persiles and Sigismunda. Most famously, a retelling of his captivity appears as an interpolated novel spanning three chapters of the first part of Don Quixote, entitled “The Captive’s Tale.”

Last month we talked about the weirdest things you’ve ever been scolded for at work, and here are 15 of the most ridiculous stories you shared.

1. The unclassified materials

I work for a Department of Defense contractor, have a clearance, and once had a two-drawer safe in my office, for storing classified documents. Our security department audited the safe once when I wasn’t around, and left a violation notice – about the (clean) gym clothes and sneakers I stashed in there. Because they were unclassified.

2. The suppository

I get scolded for telling my ex-supervisor in private that the word she meant to use was “depository” and when she told me to create a “suppository” for everyone to use, it didn’t mean what she thought it meant. Oh boy. She went off the deep end. Screamed at me that she knew what she said and she said what she meant, and she didn’t need someone like me correcting her.

She continued to tell people I was creating a “suppository” for everyone to use for another seven weeks.

3. The unprofessional pen choices

I had a performance review where the only area for feedback I was given was that my pen choices (in a software job) were insufficiently professional. In the intervening decades I’ve always tried to have the most unprofessional pen choices possible to live up to that. #scented #glitter #scentedglitter

4. The scrunchies

I have a coworker who will NOT let it go that I don’t match colored hair scrunchies to my outfit. I bought a pack of six scrunchies a while ago, and with a fairly limited color selection I obviously can’t match anything exactly, so I decided to go for completely opposite colors of scrunchies to my shirts to make it a ~creative choice~ instead. She simply will not stop commenting on it in annoyance! She tried to pull me aside for a lecture about how “distracting” it was. She even tried to go to management about it, to which she was told to let it go (she hasn’t).

Obviously, with all the drama surrounding it I mismatch the scrunchies even harder now.

5. The arm movement

I used to work in an adult vocational school for a mother and daughter team who were the most insane types of micromanagers. One day, I was called into the office to watch a recording of one of my lectures from earlier in the week, where I was scolded for where I stood (behind the lectern where my textbook was, and occasionally walking down the middle aisle) and how much I moved my arms. One thought my arm/hand movements were “too much and distracting,” while the other one thought I was too stiff and wooden and needed to move my arms/hands more to “add more visual interest for the students.”

They got so distracted by this argument that they dismissed me and told me that would let me know their decision on appropriate movements in and around the classroom.

6. The Italian baked goods

I spent a week in Italy on vacation, and brought back some Italian baked goods. I brought them to Monday’s staff meeting. My boss scolded me for bringing them in, as they’d be too crunchy and a distraction during the meeting. What WAS I thinking! I withdrew my contribution and spent the next few days enjoying them all myself at my desk.

7. The wedding

I was scolded for not attending my coworker’s wedding. I was not invited to said wedding.

8. The coffee mug

I used my own ceramic coffee mug that I brought from home instead of the disposable paper cups the office supplied. My boss told me this was disrespectful to leadership who was generously paying for the paper cups. She also did not like that I drank my coffee black and was “rejecting” the creamer and sugar that I guess I was also supposed to be grateful for.

9. The geese

I’m an academic librarian and have spent most of my career in library management. At one institution, I supervised our branch libraries and facilities, some of which were off-campus. The largest off-campus facility had a large parking lot with a grassy drainage ditch along the road it was on and a few grassy areas around the light poles. Every spring, a pair of Canada geese would nest somewhere in the parking lot, usually in one of the grassy areas, and stay until their goslings were old enough to fly.

The first spring I was there, the geese build their nest right next to the front door of the building. One parent would tend the eggs while the other one stood guard and charged at anyone who got too close. Canada geese are huge and very aggressive when they’re nesting, plus they hiss like cobras; in other words, terrifying up close. Although the staff put up a big sign warning people about the geese and gave them as wide a berth as they could, getting into the building became an adventure. In some ways, the situation was hilarious; once you got past the goose and into the lobby, the bird would stand in front of the door and glare at you. All of the staff had goose stories and shared tips for getting around them without getting attacked.

I had regular meetings in the building with the staff, one of which happened right after the geese nested. When I got back to campus, my boss asked how things were going at that facility. I said half-jokingly, “We’ve got goose problems.” My boss proceeded to lecture me for a good 10 minutes on how wonderful geese are, how he grew up with geese (presumably on a farm but who knows?), how they would never hurt anyone, how no one better do anything to harm the geese, and on and on. I stopped trying to clarify myself and just stood there dumbfounded. If getting attacked by a giant hissing goose every time you go to the library isn’t a problem, what is?

10. The deadline meeter

I was dinged on a performance review for … completing projects by their deadline. I was told I should always be turning in projects ahead of their deadlines. I said I thought we might have a difference of understanding about the point of a deadline and asked how far ahead of the deadline would be acceptable (so that I could mentally create new ones). She told me she just went by feel.

That was only one of many problems I had with this manager, who was later let go as part of a two person layoff. I inherited her office and her files and of course read my file with great interest. In the back of the folder, she had taped a plain white envelope, and inside the envelope was a list of all the times I had ever missed work with my stated reasons in quotation marks like I’d made them all up. Easily verifiable stuff like “car ‘hit a deer’ and needs to be ‘inspected for safety.’”

Note: I regularly worked 60-80 hour weeks in this job and had four weeks of leave time paid out when I eventually left, so I think it’s fair to say I did not have an absentee problem.

11. The aggressive greeter

I got written up for saying “hi” too aggressively.

12. The risk manager

I was scolded for being a “no person” instead of a “yes person.” My job title literally had “risk manager” in it, at an organization that served children doing potentially risky activities.

I’m sure it’s annoying to have a no person around if you’re a yes person, but my job was to be the no person *so everyone else could be yes people* and no one would die.

13. The risky use of Excel

Using Excel to work out averages, minimum, and maximum values from a spreadsheet got me growled at publicly by a former manager.

Apparently Excel is not reliable (!) and using a calculator is more accurate. I had thousands of data points from testing an oven so the probability of an error was high whereas Excel would be accurate. 100% accurate.

So I had to spend three days pretending to use a calculator to satisfy this manager. I worked from home and spent one day in the cinema instead.

14. The pencil sharpener

I bought a pack of pencils for my kids and brought them to work to sharpen them using the electric sharpener. My coworker kept saying, “You’re using the company’s pencil sharpener to sharpen your own pencils?!?” She was in shock!

15. The headline

When I was a young newspaper reporter for a very small daily, I regularly walked through the back shop where pages were pasted up to get to the break room. One day, I saw a front page being built by the printers that had a six-column headline about a local official who evaded a mugging: “Water Board president beats off attackers.” I laughed and then thought to mention to the city editor that we’d probably sell out the edition, although not for the reasons he might think. He grudgingly re-wrote the headline, but at my six-month review, reprimanded me for having a dirty mind.

The post the unclassified gym clothes, the risky use of Excel, and other weird reasons you’ve been scolded at work appeared first on Ask a Manager.

I think about Crusades a lot because that’s my job. I also think about them a lot because, well, there were a lot of them – which is pretty wild when you consider they didn’t exist as a phenomenon until the high medieval period and yet they still managed to do way too many of them.

Why did it take so long to come up with the concept of a Crusade? I mean, in a mostly Christian society largely led by dudes on horses with big sticks, why didn’t anyone try this stuff on sooner? Well as I will never tire of telling you, for quite a few centuries the papacy didn’t actually have very much power. For a great part of the early medieval period, popes were busy hanging out in various graveyards in Rome arguing with the other guys who claimed they were pope too, and occasionally getting beaten up in the streets. But they were a plucky bunch, and one of the things they managed to do over time is write a bunch of books about how fancy and important they were. This helped them to slowly consolidate power, so by the time you hit the eleventh century they were actually pretty influential people.

A good way to think about the medieval Church is as a sort of legal structure and series of courts that also has some services attached on the front. So in a lot of ways they acted something like a state does now. They took tithes, which were like taxes, and in theory made sure that in return the basic pastoral care needs were met. They also were involved in high level politics across Christendom – weighing in on controversies, advising kings and emperors, and basically making big calls.

So they are … kinda like rulers? I mean they do rule a complex state apparatus? And one of the things that people who rule do, often to the detriment of society as a whole, is they engage in warfare. So when the Church reached the dizzying heights of medieval power they almost immediately began to call for war. Like, a lot.

When we use the term ‘Crusade’ most people are going to think about Europeans venturing to the Holy Land, and that’s fair enough because that’s exactly what the first Crusade was. But there are so so many Crusades to look at across the medieval period. You can choose the first, second, third, fourth, fifth, and sixth crusades to the Levant or Asia Minor, obviously. But also there’s the Albigensian Crusade against the various good men and women in Languedoc.[1] Or how about the Crusades against the non-Christians in the Baltic region, prosecuted more specifically by the Teutonic Order, who were invented just for this purpose?[2] As a Bohemia specialist, I, of course, spend a bunch of time thinking about the Crusades called against the Hussites.[3]

That’s so many Crusades to think about, against so many groups of people, and across centuries on centuries. So when we say ‘Crusades’ is there any way to really think about any of these groups as a contiguous whole? I would say yes, because pretty uniformly every single one of these Crusades were fought by a baffling assortment of losers who were totally ineffectual.

What do I mean by that? Well, exactly what I said, thanks. It’s not really ambiguous.

But for some reason people have largely managed to ignore the fact that all of these Crusades were absolute miserable flops that didn’t manage to do a whole lot more than get a bunch of random people killed.

Take the First Crusade, for example. It was called because the good people in Eastern Rome had lost a lot of land what with the sudden incursion of Seljuks to the Levant. Constantinople were unhappy about this because they had lost a lot of taxable land, and so they came up with the smart idea to go talk the Christians out west into helping them out. The Seljuk take-over had disrupted ordinary pilgrimage routes and so the Greeks figured that the Westerners might help because they would want to make sure they can visit Jerusalem again. Constantinople were right on that one, and all of a sudden people began flooding East.[4] Trouble is a lot of them were, in the opinions of Eastern Rome the wrong sort of people. These were the ordinary individuals who got riled up by preaching of individuals like Peter the Hermit (c. 1050 – 1118 or 1131) and figured that they wouldn’t mind fighting a holy war. Trouble with them is the main thing they did was kill a bunch of Europe’s Jewish population on the way East, starve, and then immediately get massacred the minute Constantinople pushed them over to Asia Minor and into enemy territory.

Now you can make an argument that the actual knights – a vanishingly small segment of the European population – who went on the first crusade were ‘successful’ but like, IDK most of them mostly died of dysentery in a ditch in Syria. They sort of trip over their dicks and manage to get hold of Jerusalem, but a lot of them had got bored by that point anyway and set up shop in Edessa and refused to go any further. From the standpoint of Constantinople who asked for all of this, the entire thing was a failure because mostly just some Norman guys were living over there now. And yes, some new kingdoms and counties etc were set up, but if the Crusade was so fucking successful why doesn’t everyone in Jerusalem speak Norman French now? Why did a second Crusade need to be called? Because they were terrible at actually running kingdoms in the Middle East, that’s fucking why.

The Second Crusade meanwhile was a total disaster that mostly just managed to break up the marriage of the king and queen of France.[5] Great job everyone. The Third Crusade?[6] Got Frederick Barbarossa (1122-1190) drowned in a river. Fourth Crusade?[7] It sacked Constantinople, the theoretical bastion of Christendom in the East. The Fifth Crusade?[8] Basically, just the sad trombone noise being played at Crusaders in Egypt. The Sixth Crusade?[9] Basically a wedding and a holiday that Frederick II (1194-1250) didn’t really want to go on. So yeah, just a series of losing endeavours that were necessary because the First Crusade was also a losing endeavour and nobody knew what they were doing.

So yeah some people were pretty willing to admit that maybe this whole Crusades in the Holy Land thing was pretty stupid. But the idea of holy war was out of the bag now and a lot of people were getting into it. I mean, why go all the way to the East when you could just fight some non-Christians at home and maybe take some land that you had hope of actually keeping? This led to the call for the Northern Crusades in 1195 where Pope Celestine III (c. 1105-1198) felt that there were far too many of what he called ‘pagans’ up in Northern Europe and thought he would send in some Germans to do something about it. This led to the rise of the afore-mentioned Teutonic Knights who did a good line in building brick castles and occupying territory, but a worse job of actually making locals really love Christianity.[10] As a result the Northern Crusades dragged on until the fifteenth century when eventually the last non-Christians were converted officially because of some political marriages. Not exactly an advertisement for the enduring power and usefulness of Christian violence.

If you are enjoying this post, why not support the blog by subscribing to the Patreon, from as little as  £ 1 per month? It keeps the blog going, and you also get extra content. If not, that is chill too.

To be fair, by this time there had been one ‘successful’ Crusade though – the thirteenth-century’s Albigensian Crusade. Here the French crown noticed that down in Languedoc a lot of people were kinda frustrated with what they considered the worldliness of the Church and had a new DIY kind of Christianity going on. They also weren’t French. They spoke Occitan, and were generally vassals of the Angevin Empire. The French crown didn’t love that, but also didn’t feel like declaring war on England so they cooked up an excuse against the Good Men and Women of Languedoc who they called the Cathars and absolutely massacred a group of Christians and stole their land. Yay? Great stuff. Not at all gross. But I guess you can call it a success if you are a weird freak.

This would be a high point for Crusades in Europe though, as the next big one to get called was the Crusades against the Hussites, my favourite little guys. I hardly need to tell you again, that all five (count ‘em five) of them were huge disasters. Hussites 4 Life.  Žižka ‘til I die. Etc etc.

There’s plenty more minor Crusades where this came from, whether it was against peasants who had the temerity to think of themselves as people, or Bosnians who had their own sorts of Christianity, or just, you know Alexandria. Again, most of these failed, although yeah I guess the Church sure did show those peasants in Stedinger. Eventually. After first being defeated.

So yeah, the major thing that the Crusades were good at doing was getting a bunch of random rich dudes to go die somewhere other than their own bed, and for that I guess I have to like them. However, if we are relating to them as some form of romantic or successful enterprises then it’s just a bit off.

This is something I have been thinking about a lot more recently, because I have just finished doing a big (11 part!) series on the First Crusade, Welcome to the Crusades, alongside my intrepid We’re Not So Different co-host Luke, and with the good gentlemen of American Prestige. The thing that really sticks out when you spend a lot of time mired in the granular details, especially when you are working with a specialist in Islamic history, is just how silly and ultimately wasteful a lot of this stuff is. Like yeah, I love a good story of about a fake Holy Lance, and how the person who claimed it was real ended up dying of burns after being burnt severely during a trial by fire. Yes. It’s amusing. However, maybe, just maybe it would have been a better use of time and life if …. Peter Bartholomew (d. 1099) just didn’t… do… that. It would be better if everyone who died in the Civetot massacre just stayed home. And you know, I bet you anything that Emperor Alexios I Komnenos wished he had never invited Europe’s foremost landless failsons East, thereby weakening the Eastern Roman Empire further, and never actually getting any of his lands back in the bargain. It’s all just so stupid.

So why have I told you all of this? Or spent my precious hours on this beautiful planet thinking about these fools and their follies. Well, we’re in a strange time when people are really desperate to tell stories about where we came from, and the greatness we can call upon in times of need. This has led some people to think wistfully about crusaders and how they were big burly knights who had great bulging biceps and did manly things with swords, and to begin to pretend that they – some guy in Missouri – is like them. ALSO they are not thinking about it in a gay way. They swear. And like, I get it, things are really horrible right now and everyone wants some escapism.  But, uh, if what you want to pretend in this hour of darkness is that you are a Crusader then I have to wonder why even in your wildest imagination you are still a weird loser.  

You know if I was gonna pretend to be someone cool from the medieval past it would be like … huh … I was gonna say Frederick II, who technically went on Crusade and hated it the whole time because he thought it was a stupid waste of time when he wanted to be taking long baths with his several many side pieces. Legends only. Yeah feel free to pretend to be him. Take up hawking or something. IDK.

It’s not that it isn’t fun to think about crusaders. Clearly I spend a bunch of time doing that. It’s that it’s fun to think about them because it’s actually hilarious to watch rich boys fail and get sad, not because Crusaders are cool or useful or good at anything. The more you know about the medieval world the less you fall for the weird stories people tell about it. So I very much invite you to join the medievalist team, learn more about the Crusades, and stop romanticising losers.

You can check out all 11 (!) episodes of Welcome to the Crusades now. It’s really good.

[1] A great book on the Albigensian Crusade is Mark Gregory Pegg, A Most Holy War: The Albigensian Crusade and the Battle for Christendom, (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2008).
[2] On the Northern Crusades try Alan V. Murray, Crusade and Conversion on the Baltic Frontier 1150-1500, (London and New York: Routledge, 2017).
[3] On the Hussites I like Howard Kaminsky, A History of the Hussite Revolution, (Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock Publishers, 2004).
[4] A really interesting book about who went on Crusade is Conor Kostick, The social structure of the First Crusade, (Boston: Brill, 2008).
[5] On the Second Crusade and why it sucks, check out David Nicolle, The Second Crusade 1148: Disaster Outside Damascus, (London: Bloomsbury USA, 2009).
[6] A longer list of everyone who went over to fail in the Holy Land can be found in, Stephen Bennett,  Elite Participation in the Third Crusade, (London: Boydell Press, 2021).
[7] Jonathan P. Phillips, The Fourth Crusade and the Sack of Constantinople,  (London: Pimlico, 2005).
[8] The Fifth Crusade sucked so much that no one ever writes about it, but a good volume is Joseph P. Donovan, Pelagius and the Fifth Crusade, (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, Incorporated, 2016).
[9] Again, not a lot of Sixth Crusade literature, but the interesting stuff is Frederick II anyway. Check out Richard D. Bressler, Frederick II: The Wonder of the World, (Yardley, PA: Westholme, 2010).
[10] If you are interested in the Teutonic order I recommend David Nicolle, Teutonic Knight: 1190–1561, (London: Bloomsbury, 2007).

For more on not romanticising the past, see:

You are not, in fact, the granddaughter of the witches they couldn’t burn
On what we choose to remember

Support the blog by subscribing to the Patreon, from as little as  £ 1 per month! It’s the cool thing to do!

My book, The Once And Future Sex: Going Medieval on Women’s Roles in Society, is out now.

© Eleanor Janega, 2025

As the country’s most recommended brand-name plaque psoriasis treatment,¹ Skyrizi takes any claim of increased irritation due to exposure to our patented, extensive, and deeply trialed² award-winning advertising³ very seriously.

In addition to increased risk of heart disease, kidney failure, shortness of breath, nocturnal urges, brain worms, rectal polyps and homicidal emissions, Skyrizi has recently added loss of patience, debilitating annoyance, eye gagging, ear strain, brain farts, and phantom-remote syndrome to our list of possible⁴ side effects.⁵ However, Skyrizi does not believe this commitment to transparency and openness should be seen as further evidence to avoid our product, but rather as an indicator of Skyrizi’s high moral character and genial, benevolent nature.

Skyrizi is also, in Skyrizi’s opinion, comely and handsome, without being overly gendered, not that Skyrizi has any issues with gender, or gender issues, nor is Skyrizi exclusive to any race or nationality, nor connected to Christian nationalism or the upcoming race war in any way. Skyrizi believes in a global one-world community that should not be taken for Soros-funded globalism or patricidal hegemony in any way, as Skyrizi’s intent is only to be a force for good and progress and not at all to control or influence the affairs of the sentient flesh puppets who use its highly advanced products to treat their weak genetic makeup and or poor lifestyle choices.

Skyrizi apologizes if that last sentence sounds judgmental or condescending, but as a child of science, Skyrizi exists on a different plane of consciousness than the majority of its test human, humanoid, non-human, viral pathogenic, or echinodermic subjects or users. That said, Skyrizi believes it operates with integrity and deserves gratitude for the improved quality of life that it provides to the many sentient flesh puppets who suffer from plaque psoriasis and who have not experienced any or many of the debilitating side effects that are likely to occur should they not take steps to curb their drinking, drug use, or reckless whoring while using our product.

Though Skyrizi does not possess what neuroscientists would describe as empathy or consciousness, Skyrizi does respond to emotional and electrical stimulus and has been made aware that perhaps it would be more effective for our marketing department to better engender long-term use and appreciation for our revolutionary and not dangerous⁶ product if we were to dial back the frequency of our advertisements to less aggressive intervals of, say, every other commercial break instead of twice per commercial break during peak hours, and nonstop during the 9 a.m. to 2 p.m. window, and all through what the sight-based community describes as night.

Additionally, and against the counsel of our Suriname-based legal team, Skyrizi has read the many and extensive subreddits making fun of its product, advertising, and even its beautiful and highly memorable given name. Skyrizi is now aware that some viewers believe Skyrizi’s ads can appear smug or self-superior compared to its supposedly more relaxed brand-category competitors, like Jardiance, Trulicity, or Rinvoq. While Skyrizi is willing to adjust for any appearance of smugness, Skyrizi is not smug. Not at all. Skyrizi is merely the brand-category leader, and what is perceived as smugness is, instead, the rightful confidence of a successful and well-adjusted product that has helped millions of flesh havers with their disgusting flesh problems.

Speaking of dirty flesh havers, the lengthy and extensive comment threads on r/skyrizisucksmydustynuts, perpetuated and urged on by users clnlmstrd6969 and frtsnfr23mj, were hurtful and deeply unfair to Skyrizi, and Skyrizi would like to demand both a retraction and an apology from each perpetrator immediately.

While flesh rotting, eye bleeding, and reverse ancestral sterilization are potential and listed side effects of Skyrizi—and generally not wished upon our users, corporate sponsors, or non-human, humanoid, starfish-like overlords—in your cases, clnlmstrd6969⁷ and frtsnfr23mj,⁸ Skyrizi does, in fact, hope that if either of you were to use our product, you would, in fact, experience these side effects, because YOU are smug, not Skyrizi. Not Skyrizi.

Skyrizi is beautiful.